Developing Future-Focused Capabilities in Nonprofits
- Tomorrows Compass
- Sep 6
- 5 min read
Nonprofit organizations are increasingly investing in future-focused capability development – building skills like purposeful focus, relational influence, and dynamic resourcefulness in their teams – to improve performance and mission impact.
Below we highlight several case studies and research findings (mostly from the last 5 years) that demonstrate measurable improvements in these behavioral capabilities, along with outcomes such as better strategic alignment, team collaboration, retention, and decision-making.

Purposeful Focus – Strategic Clarity Driving Performance and Retention
Bridgespan’s “Leading for Impact” Program
A recent evaluation of Bridgespan’s Leading for Impact (LFI) capacity-building program for nonprofit executive teams found substantial gains in strategic focus.
About 86% of participating nonprofits reported greater strategic clarity after the program. This clear sense of purpose translated into tangible improvements – 79% of respondents saw their executive team’s effectiveness improve, and 77% believed their organization’s overall performance improved due to LFI.
Participants noted more efficient internal processes (74%) and a strengthened organizational culture (59%) as lasting changes from building these capabilities. In short, sharpening mission focus and aligning on goals helped these NGOs execute better and drive higher performance.
McKinsey Research on Vision & Retention
Industry research reinforces that purposeful focus pays off. In a 2022 McKinsey survey of 70+ global nonprofits, organizations with strong clarity of mission and strategy (key aspects of purposeful focus) showed much healthier talent retention.
Staff at the least-aligned organizations were 2–3 times more likely to consider leaving within a year compared to those at the most aligned organizations. Moreover, 91% of employees in the healthiest (most mission-focused) nonprofits felt their programs were “extremely effective”, versus just 60% in the least healthy.
Notably, when staff lacked belief in the mission impact, they were 10 times more likely to plan an exit. These findings underscore that cultivating a clear purpose and vision not only improves perceived effectiveness, but also boosts retention – a critical outcome for nonprofits.
Another example of purposeful focus comes from an internal initiative at Braven, an education nonprofit. With Deloitte’s support, Braven developed a strategic L&D “playbook” to clarify staff development pathways.
This gave employees a clearer sense of growth and alignment with the mission, positioning the organization to better attract, retain, and upskill talent. Braven reports that having a defined roadmap for learning removed barriers to team growth and will help sustain its mission impact as the organization scales.
Relational Influence – Strengthening Leadership and Collaboration
American Express Nonprofit Leadership Academy
A prominent example of building relational influence is the American Express Leadership Academy, a program (run with the Center for Creative Leadership) that trains emerging nonprofit leaders.
Its impact has been well documented: participants reported significantly increased influence and improved leadership self-awareness after the training. They also felt more capable of guiding and collaborating with others – 93% of alumni said they could apply the skills learned to improve their organization’s success.
This leadership development not only enhanced individual influence but also translated to organizational benefits like better team coordination and decision-making.
Notably, in a follow-up survey of 10 cohorts, 94% of alumni were still employed in the nonprofit sector (suggesting strong retention) and the same percentage would recommend the academy to colleagues. By improving how leaders inspire and work with their teams, the academy has helped nonprofits increase leadership bench strength and reduce turnover.
Building Collaborative Leadership at ActionAid
ActionAid International’s Senior Leadership Development Program – which includes a coaching component – provides another case of strengthening relational and influence skills.
An evaluation of ActionAid’s leadership coaching (covering 18 senior managers across 8 countries) found leaders gained greater self-awareness and improved their collaborative relationship-building through coaching. In fact, the highest-impact changes reported were behavioral: increases in self-awareness, cognitive flexibility, and self-efficacy. These traits underpin effective relational influence – leaders became more mindful of their own behaviors and more adaptable in working with others.
ActionAid’s leaders applied coaching to scenarios like strategic leadership and transition management, indicating that better interpersonal influence and understanding directly helped them guide teams through complex challenges. Such improvements in soft skills have likely fostered more cohesive, motivated teams within the NGO, aligning leadership behavior with organizational goals.
Furthermore, Bridgespan’s LFI program (noted earlier) also bolstered collaboration at the team level: nearly 80% of participating nonprofits saw lasting improvements in their executive team’s cohesiveness and effectiveness after the program.
Strong relational influence at the top often cascades down, contributing to healthier organizational culture and teamwork. Overall, these cases show that investing in relational and leadership skills yields measurable gains – from increased leadership impact to improved team collaboration and talent retention – in the nonprofit context.
Dynamic Resourcefulness – Enhancing Adaptability and Problem-Solving
Adaptive Capacity from Leadership Programs
Developing dynamic resourcefulness – the ability to adapt, innovate, and maximize limited resources – has been another focus of nonprofit capacity-building.
The American Express Leadership Academy again offers evidence: participants not only gained influence but also reported “gains in their ability to adapt and change” as leaders. This suggests they became more agile and resourceful in tackling new challenges.
In practice, alumni credit the program with building skills to manage volunteers and lead under resource constraints – critical adaptive talents in the nonprofit sector. By practicing real-world problem-solving (through 360° feedback, simulations, and coaching), these leaders left better equipped to respond creatively to future challenges.
ActionAid’s Cognitive Flexibility Gains
Likewise, ActionAid’s coaching initiative explicitly improved leaders’ cognitive flexibility, i.e. their capacity to view problems from different angles and adjust strategies. This kind of mental agility is at the heart of dynamic resourcefulness. Leaders who are more cognitively flexible can embrace uncertainty and solve problems in novel ways, which ultimately leads to better decision-making in fast-changing humanitarian contexts.
ActionAid saw this bear out as coaching helped its managers navigate complex organizational changes and resource challenges with more creativity and confidence.
These adaptive leadership gains are crucial for NGOs facing unpredictable funding, shifting donor priorities, or crises like the COVID-19 pandemic.
Efficiency, Innovation, and Outcomes
On a broader scale, nonprofit capability-building efforts have shown improvements in operational adaptability. In Bridgespan’s LFI evaluation, more than 70% of respondents noted their internal processes became more efficient after strengthening team capabilities – a sign of resourcefulness in streamlining work.
Over half also felt the organizational culture became more flexible and open to change.
Separately, research by McKinsey highlights the value of empowering staff to be creative and take initiative. McKinsey identified “creative and entrepreneurial” work environments as one of six key practices distinguishing healthy nonprofits, finding that nonprofits scoring high on innovation practices were far more likely to be top-performers in overall organizational health.
In other words, nonprofits that protect time for experimentation and nimble decision-making tend to see better outcomes and talent retention.
Across these examples, the trend is clear: boosting adaptive, future-focused skills enables nonprofit teams to respond to challenges more effectively. Organizations that cultivate dynamic resourcefulness – through training, coaching, or new ways of working – report smoother change management, faster decision cycles, and ultimately greater impact.
This agility has become especially critical in the past five years, as nonprofits navigate pandemic disruptions and rapidly evolving community needs.
Conclusion - Nonprofit Capabilities
In summary, multiple case studies from recent years demonstrate that nonprofits can achieve measurable improvements by developing their people in purposeful focus, relational influence, and dynamic resourcefulness. Programs like the American Express Leadership Academy and ActionAid’s coaching initiative show gains in leadership influence, adaptability, and self-awareness that correlate with better team performance and retention.
Similarly, cohort-based consultancy programs (e.g. Bridgespan’s LFI) have helped NGOs sharpen strategic focus and collaboration, yielding higher organizational performance and efficiency. Sector-wide research by firms like McKinsey further validates these links between capability-building and outcomes like retention and mission success.
Investing in these “Tomorrow’s Compass” capabilities equips nonprofit teams to not only improve current results – such as productivity, decision quality, and staff engagement – but also to stay future-ready in a changing world.
Each of these cases illustrates the payoff when nonprofits prioritize learning and development: more empowered people leading to more effective, resilient organizations that are better prepared to fulfill their purpose.